Back From the Dead: Why Putting Old Call of Duty Games on Game Pass Could Be a Dangerous Move

In a move that should have excited fans, Microsoft added Call of Duty: WWII to PC Game Pass recently. But within days, it was pulled. The reason? A full-blown hacker infestation that didn’t just ruin matches — it endangered people’s systems.

With Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard finally complete, fans have been buzzing with anticipation over what could come next for Call of Duty on Game Pass. The idea of booting up Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops II, or World at War with a Game Pass subscription sounds like a dream come true for longtime players — especially those who miss the golden era of split-screen trick shots and chaotic zombies lobbies.

There’s no doubt that Game Pass is becoming Microsoft’s flagship platform. Adding legacy Call of Duty titles makes perfect business sense. It re-engages lapsed players, boosts subscription value, and capitalizes on the franchise’s massive nostalgia factor. In fact, some of these older titles have already seen revived popularity in recent months, thanks to community-driven hype and modded servers.

But that dream is now running into reality — and it’s not pretty. Call of Duty: WWII was supposed to be a low-risk first step toward bringing back older entries. Instead, it’s become a warning sign of what happens when you bring old games with unpatched vulnerabilities into a modern platform with millions of users.

The situation with Call of Duty: WWII wasn’t just annoying—it was dangerous. The game became a hotbed for remote code execution (RCE) attacks, a type of exploit where malicious users can run code on another player’s machine simply by being in the same game session. In plain terms: someone halfway across the country could access your PC and manipulate it, just because you played a match with them.

And this isn’t limited to WWII. These vulnerabilities are deeply embedded in the IW engine — a codebase that has been the backbone of Call of Duty for nearly two decades. From Modern Warfare to Black Ops, from World at War to Advanced Warfare, many older titles run on versions of the same foundation. As one user put it bluntly:

“No it’s not [just WWII]. There is a way for people to access your PC just by connecting to you in a game. It affects every old COD because it uses the same engine. Including Quake.”

This isn’t just a cheat code arms race. It’s an infrastructure problem. Old games, especially those that haven’t received active support or security updates in years, become breeding grounds for exploits. These vulnerabilities weren’t designed for today’s online ecosystem — and malicious actors know it.

The text boxes, forced pop-ups, and PC manipulations players have documented aren’t theoretical threats. They’re real-time demonstrations of what happens when a popular platform like Game Pass intersects with forgotten game code and modern hacker communities.

The idea of revisiting classic Call of Duty titles on Game Pass sounds like a win. But nostalgia shouldn’t override basic digital safety. If Microsoft is serious about rolling out older Call of Duty games to millions of Game Pass subscribers, especially on PC, it must also be serious about securing them.

These aren’t harmless bugs. These are vulnerabilities that allow strangers to access players’ machines — not in theory, but in practice. Pulling WWII from the PC catalog was the right move. Now the real question is: will Microsoft fix the problem before they bring more of these games back?

The excitement around bringing legacy titles to Game Pass is real. But that excitement can’t blind us to the risks. Pushing these games live again without major investment in security patches or backend protections doesn’t just set up bad multiplayer experiences — it opens the door to real, widespread damage.

What Should Parents Know and Do?

Game Pass is a subscription service from Microsoft that gives users access to a large library of video games. Recently, there’s been talk of adding older Call of Duty titles to the platform. While these games haven’t been added yet, it’s important for parents to be aware of a potential risk tied to these older titles—especially on PC.

Many of these older games have serious security vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit. In some cases, just joining an online match could allow a bad actor to access another player’s computer. While this might sound extreme, gamers and cybersecurity experts have been sounding the alarm for years. And because these games are often sold cheaply at resale stores like GameStop or found for a few dollars online, they’re easy for kids to pick up without knowing the risks.

Here’s what parents should keep in mind:

  • Be cautious of older Call of Duty titles on PC, whether bought through Game Pass or secondhand. If vulnerabilities remain unpatched, they could expose your child’s device.
  • Ask your child what they’re playing and where they got it. If they mention downloading or buying older games, especially for PC, take a closer look.
  • Talk to your child about online safety in games, including avoiding sketchy servers and not sharing personal info in chats.
  • Use basic cybersecurity tools like firewalls and antivirus software to add protection in case something slips through.
  • Avoid giving kids admin access on their gaming computers, which can limit the damage if something does go wrong.

While these risks might not be well known, they’re real—and worth paying attention to. Staying aware can help you keep gaming safe and fun for your child.

Until there’s transparency and a clear security roadmap, older Call of Duty titles should remain offline — or at least off Game Pass. Gamers deserve better than to risk their systems for a shot of nostalgia.

Is social media making kids sad?

Anxiety among kids is on the upswing – and is now the leading mental health issue among children in America. Why? In this article on BayState Parent, some medical and neurological experts note that social media use is stressing kids out and giving them an unrealistic view of the world. Near-constant device use is causing mental health issues for many, and making it more difficult to escape the very factors that give them anxiety.

Do you think social media is contributing to negative feelings among kids? How much access do your children have to social networking sites like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat? Leave me a comment and let’s chat!

 

Study: Children just “three clicks away” from inappropriate content

Results of a study released earlier this month by security products vendor Kaspersky Lab finds children can be as little as three clicks away from inappropriate or adult content on YouTube.

youtube-logo

From the report:

Examining YouTube’s ‘suggested’ videos which sit visibly alongside clips or episodes of popular children’s television programs such as Peppa Pig, Rastamouse and Dora the Explorer, researchers found that, on average, users are just three clicks away from content better suited to a more mature audience.

Music videos featuring violence, guns and nudity, clips of post watershed television programs and car crash compilations are some examples of the inappropriate content just a few clicks away on the video sharing website. These results highlight the potential risks such sites pose if parental controls are not activated or children are left unattended while browsing.

I know I’ve experienced this many times when I have allowed my children to spend some time on YouTube.  One minute they are innocently watching an episode of Pajaminals, and the next thing I know they have stumbled upon video with questionable content, including obscene language and violence.

One particular trend I’ve noticed is the “parody” videos that tend to lead good-intentioned children into suddenly viewing things they are too young to see or understand.  For example, my kids like the very popular internet character Fred Figglehorn (created by teen actor, and now Nickelodeon star, Lucas Cruikshank).  The Fred videos are pretty silly and a bit over the top, but generally age appropriate for my children. Unfortunately, there are many “parodies” (people making fun) of the Fred character, too. These tend to be wildly inappropriate for young children. Same goes for many other popular kids shows, like Sponge Bob or even Sesame Street.

It’s best to allow YouTube viewing only when you can be in the room, too, and with the volume loud enough so you can hear what is going on.  Check in frequently and assist younger children with making appropriate choices.

[Related: 4 tips to help your kids stay safe on Facebook]

David Emm, senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab, offers additional suggestions for protecting your children.

Supervision – This may seem obvious, but supervise your child’s Internet use. Encourage them to visit and stay on websites you’re familiar with. If you have any concerns you can look at their browsing history. Be sure to know about any password protected sites they may be accessing and ask them to share their login details with you.

Be open – Encourage your child to be open about what they are doing online and who they are socializing with. Promote a culture of safety within the home and talk about the possible dangers which exist.

Protect your family – Use parental control on sites you don’t want your child looking at as part of your online security product – it’s an easy way to avoid disaster.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑